Another
Political Prisoner of
The Bush
Brothers Banana Republic
The Story of Ian Thomas,
Mapping Specialist
I was completely unaware that
there was
anything
wrong with publishing ANWR maps.
I have
never been informed of any
agency
restrictions or any other guidelines
on
publishing maps depicting ANWR...
I only
now have been informed that there is
a two
week old agency "communications directive"
that
limits who is allowed to distribute
new
information on ANWR within my agency.
There's a census map of page A18
of the March 16, 2001 issue of the New York Times that breaks down the
populations of all the New This is a message from the government contractor who
was fired by the federal government because he posted a map of caribou calving
areas in ANWR, where GWB and Norton want to drill for oil. I received it via
Red Rock Eater news service, by Phil Agre, prof at UCLA. For a press account
see:
LOS
ANGELES TIMES, March 15, 2001: Federal
Worker Is Fired in Wildlife Refuge Map Flap
http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/slwebcli?DBLIST=lt01&DOCNUM=21023&TEMPLATE=9002&DBPUB=20010315rMygwWCT&QDesc=Federal%20Worker%20Is%20Fired%20in%20Wildlife%20Refuge%20Map%20Flap
Hi All,
Well, I have been fired for
posting to the internet a single web page with some maps showing the
distribution of caribou calving areas in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(ANWR).
My entire website http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/geotech/
has now been removed from the internet. This represents about 3 years worth of
work and 20,000 plus maps showing bird, mammal and amphibian distributions,
satellite imagery, landcover and vegetation maps for countries and protected
areas all around of the globe. As far as I am aware it was one of the biggest
collections of maps online and certainly the biggest collection showing maps of
biodiversity and the environment. The website was often visited by over a
thousand visitors each week. In addition, I was fulfilling roughly a dozen
requests for geospatial data and information from colleagues, other researchers
and the general public each day.
All of this comes as a rather
big surprise to me. I was given no chance to remove the web page or even finish
writing an appeal before my position was terminated. I was working under a
contract so I believe I have very little legal recourse. I have received no
written explanation (or even an email) stating the exact reasons for the termination
decision and I understand that even though this would be a reasonable courtesy
to expect, it is unlikely to be forthcoming.
From my viewpoint my dismissal
was a high-level political decision to set an example to other Federal scientists.
I base this belief on the following information I received from a colleague in
Alaska who is a leading researcher on the issues involved:
"I really hope you don't
get fired. In fact, had the timing of what you did not been so inappropriate
based on everything else that was going on, I doubt that anyone would have
noticed. Your work showed a lot of initiative..."
"...the fallout would not
have been so great had the subject matter not been one of the three USDOI super
hot topics with the new administration and had we not been briefing the
Secretary at the nearly exact time your website went up. Everyone is nervous
and as I mentioned earlier, consistency in presentation is paramount."
So now, I believe my only
recourse is to appeal to the general public in the hope that in the future what
just happened to me will not happen to others.
I would recommend anybody in a
similar circumstances to contact the fine people at Public Employees for
Environmental Responsibility (http://www.peer.org)
or a similar organization.
The response and support I have
received from friends online has been truly amazing. I very much appreciate how
quickly people have acted on my behalf and helped publicize my plight and I
especially wish to thank the international mapping community...receiving
letters of support from far away places cheers me up no end. Please feel free
to forward this email to other lists and media contacts! I would also be
grateful if anybody who misses all the maps I put on the internet please contact the USGS to let them know
and to ask that the maps be reposted.
I feel very bad that these
events are also affecting my colleagues at Patuxent. Patuxent was a great place
to work, has amazing researchers and everybody I worked with is very
supportive.
Many, many thanks for your
support,
Ian Thomas
The Details:
Nobody instructed/authorized me
to post the web pages on Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It was done on my own
initiative. I was working on land cover maps for all National Wildlife Refuges
using the new National Landcover Datasets. Last week I published over 1000 land
cover maps online covering every National Wildlife Refuge and National Park in
the lower 48. (These maps have now been removed from the internet, too). Similar
land cover data for Alaska were not available but the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge had a good landcover map so I included it.
In the past, I helped produce
the only set of maps online showing all bird species distributions in Alaska.
In addition I have produced online mammal distribution atlases of Africa, maps
for tigers in Asia and I was working on digitizing North American mammal range
maps produced by the Smithsonian Institution.
I have also been conducting
background research to prepare proposals to study the effects of mineral
extraction on biodiversity and protected areas on a very large scale. One such
proposal that I was preparing would have looked at exporting analysis and
mapping methods applied in the United States to other regions of the World such
as Africa. The proposal was co-sponsored by the Mineral Division of USGS and
the World Resources Institute.
The migration of caribou in
North America is the closest thing that we have to the great mammal migrations
that occur in Africa. African protected areas are also under great pressure
from possible development for mineral extraction. So the caribou distributions
that I found on the Fish and Wildlife Service public website were of particular
interest. I have also worked for several years on maps of migratory bird
distribution patterns. I therefore have a great interest in other migratory
animals as many of the temporal mapping problems are similar.
I was completely unaware that
there was anything wrong with publishing ANWR maps. I have never been informed
of any agency restrictions or any other guidelines on publishing maps depicting
ANWR...I only now have been informed that there is a two week old agency
"communications directive" that limits who is allowed to distribute
new information on ANWR within my agency.
I thought that I was helping
further public and scientific understanding and debate of the issues at ANWR by
making some clearer maps. I also hoped that colleagues in USGS would see the
maps and then contact me if they needed additional mapping help. I was careful to
quote my sources and explain what I had done. I made no statement about what
the maps might mean with regard to oil development of the refuge.
The web pages were put up on
Wednesday, March 7, last week. The first thing I did when I put the ANWR pages
up on the internet was to inform other USGS Biological Resources Division
mapping people and other agency (Fish Wildlife Service and National Park
Service respectively) GIS people through email that they were on the web.
Informing other Federal colleagues and agencies immediately upon publication to
the web appears to me to be the only reasonable review process available, seeing
as there is no internal review website currently available ... I have never
been informed of any other established procedure for review of web content on
our site. I actually haven't had any complaints about or requests to change any
other map on my website...
I assumed that if anybody had a
problem they could contact me directly and quickly and appropriate steps could
be taken almost immediately. I received one warning from a colleague that the
maps I put on the internet should be removed. Unfortunately, it was sent on
Saturday so I did not receive it in time. I think the decision to terminate me was
taken before I even got to work on Monday.
I also assumed that because all
I was doing was essentially presenting existing public information in a clearer
and improved format, there was very little need for any extensive review other
than the steps I took. Indeed the changes that I made to the original Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) web maps were simply to digitize them ("trace"),
then overlay them on satellite and vegetation maps and then summarize how may
years specific areas were a high density caribou calving area. I found a
similar (poor quality) summary map on the FWS website that allowed me to check
the accuracy of my simple analysis.
I was unaware that FWS had
updated the data. There is no mention of updated information on the FWS
website. This new data has still to be made public. If my maps were inaccurate
in any way so are the public FWS maps I copied.... (please refer to http://www.r7.fws.gov/nwr/arctic/pchmap2.html#section6)
I think that over the last three
years I have put more maps up on the internet (at a guess approaching 20,000 to
30,000 static individual maps) equaling any other website on the world wide
web. So out of the tens of thousands of maps (and hours) I finally publish one
that got me fired....I suppose the odds were going to run out eventually....
I am concerned that other
Federal researchers may easily make the same mistakes I just made and should
learn from my example what happens if you're not careful.
Patuxent was a great place to
work, has amazing researchers and everybody I worked with is very supportive.
Ian Thomas
Former Mapping Specialist at
the:
GIS & Remote Sensing Unit
Biological Resources Division
United States Geological Survey
Patuxent Wildlife Research
Center
Old Homepage (no longer
available)
http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/geotech/home.html
The Global Environmental Atlas
(no longer available)
http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/geotech/cindi/world
ACTION ALERT!
SUPPORT IAN THOMAS
SUPPORT DISCLOSURE
OPPOSE POLITICAL REVENGE
SNAIL MAIL THE RESIDENT:
George W. Bush
White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
CONTACT YOUR SENATORS